We have this tissue (human Spleen). It was bought for fungus and we did the GMS stain for it but not sure of it’s type. To me (untrained eye), it looks like blastomycosis. It stained positive with GMS, has budding and otherwise looks like round circles. I’m sorry, I don’t have H&E pictures yet, they are coming later.
Since I am not a pathologist, just interested in all tissues, with all stains, I’m asking you to help me identify this fungus type.
If you need immunohistochemistry for your project, we have years of experience working with both known and unknown antibody protocols. We can get your project done fast with great results at a fraction of the price. Call or email us today!
When I first got the calendar from Mercedes Medical in the mail as a promotion, not even looking at it, I tacked it up on the wall. The first month I saw was March but being so busy, I didn’t even have time to look at the picture. Then I turned the picture to April and saw the above picture. Does anyone (beside me) recognize it? I mean, aside from what stain or tissue it is, but more importantly to me, where it comes from.
I’ll give you a hint, it’s originates from this site.
There are 10 total pictures out of 12 that they bought our pictures from Dreamstime.com.
We do a fair amount of special and fluorescent staining that requires aqueous mounting media and not the toluene based glue. Normally for special stains I make up a glycerin jelly that has phenol and must be kept in the refrigerator. This was taught to be the standard of aqueous cover slipping media. It never dries, sticks to everything and smells terrible.
The fluorescent slides need something different, usually a special fluor mount bought at one of the large chemical companies. This mount allows for very little light distortion while viewing through a con-focal or fluorescent scope. The amount of light distortion is called refractive index. Some of these mounting medias that having a low refractive index of 1.47 can be very expensive, $162.00 plus shipping for 10 ml.
10 ml may be enough to cover slip 300 slides if using only 30 um per slide but that adds $.60 to the cost of every slide. That may not seem like much but when it’s added to the total after processing, embedding, cutting, antibody plus working hours it can push the average researchers budget to the edge.
I thought, there has to be something better than this. Large companies get most of their protocols from the old histology books and change 1 micro-gram and it becomes proprietary. Then the price depends on demand and repeat customers (way too high). This is what I call commercial brutality.
I’m way to enterprising to pay these prices and be happy about it. Therefore I too will develop a protocol from the books and change one aspect of it and call it my own. The difference is, I will formulate it, test it, have others test it, then make it available to all the labs I have daily contact with (10) and help them save money.
One way to stop this money merry go round is to limit profits from unbelievable pricing on medical products. Paying $500.00 for a water bath that lasts 10 years is absurd! $162.00 for 10 ml of mounting media is too much!
I have made 25 ml the histo-lo-gis-tics version of aqueous mounting media for about $20.00, but could be 100 ml for $40.00. That’s the cost if you make it for yourself. It’s a room temp, permanent media that will last for 2-3 years with anti fading agent and refractive index of 1.46. So far it’s been tested by 2 independent labs in fluorescent microscopy and passed with no distortion. 2 more labs will be testing it this week and mine soon.
After testing is done, I will update the results, good or not good and post the recipe if it’s useful.